Chinese Government’s Ethnic Minorities Policy and TERRORISM: Focusing on Uyghur's Separation-Independence Movement

Disaster
By. Sungtaek Cho Views. 1666

Abstract

Purpose: The reality is that ethnic conflicts exist in a multi-ethnic society. After the Cold War, the issue of ethnic identity and discrimination, which had been suppressed under the socialist system, was rapidly highlighted, and national division began. However, from the perspective of a dominant nation seeking international status as a powerful nation, the separation of ethnic minorities is considered a crisis of national dissolution, so it tries to thoroughly prevent the separation of minorities. In this process, terrorism occurs and government control and pressure become intense. This phenomenon is considered in this paper.

Method: Under the socialist system, the Soviet Union and China have controlled multi-ethnic societies with ideology. However, after the Cold War, an independent state began to be established as a wave of separatist nationalism spread in Eastern Europe, including Russia. China has implemented a strengthened "one China policy" to nip this phenomenon in the bud at home. In particular, it sought to undermine separatist nationalism against the Uyghurs and Tibetans. We examine China's strategy for ethnic minorities and Uyghur's resistance from a historical perspective.

Results: Xinjiang is a geopolitical important area. The Chinese government wants to defend against potential Western threats by controlling the region. Some extremist groups of ethnic minorities are also implementing multidimensional policies to fundamentally block armed struggles and attempts to carry out terrorism for secession. The politics of suppression of minorities will continue for the time being because it is not easy to dismantle the cultural and religious identity of minorities.

Conclusion: It is a matter that cannot be coerced into assimilating minorities by a dominant ethnic group. If there is no prerequisite for recognizing ethnic differences and policies for national reconciliation, a coercive system will only produce conflict. To ensure that terrorism is not a means of expressing resistance to discrimination, imperial political behavior must be abandoned.

[Keywords] Ethnic Minorities, One Chinese Policy, Shanghai Pact, Re-Education Camp, Separation Independence



References

[1] Hobsbaum E. Identity Politics and the Left. New Left Review, 217, 38-47 (1996).
[2] Park DK & Jo SG. Cases and Countermeasure of Indiscriminate Terrorism. International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 5(1), 25-31 (2020). [Article]
[3] Park WS. A Study on the Improvement of Terrorism Response in Subway Crisis and Public Trans-portation. International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 5(1), 48-59 (2020). [Article]
[4] Chung JW. Central Asia, Chinese Xinjiang, and the Uighur Problem. Slav Newspaper, 30(2), 317-362 (2015).
[5] Kim CH. The Xinjiang Uyghurs Resistance Movement as a National Liberation Movement. Marxism, 14(3), 144-168 (2017).
[6] Woo DC. The Historical Background and Its Reality of the Uyghur Separation Movement. History Opening Tomorrow, 39, 175-192 (2010).
[7] Lee DR. Separatism in Xinjiang. The Korean Journal of International Studies, 43(3), 317-338, (2003).
[8] Yun MW. The Problem of Uyghur Nationalism, Uyghur Terrorism, and the State Terrorism of the Chinse State. Korean Security Journal, 45, 107-127 (2015).
[9] Lee KH. A Study on Chinese Minority Policy in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region. Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, 13(4), 207-231 (2008).
[10] Kim SC. The Study on Xinjiang Muslim Community in 20th Century. Korean Journal of Middle East Studies, 37(1), 161-191 (2016).
[11] Lee KM & Yang SD. Review on the Function of Counterterrorism Intelligence Community in US. International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 4(1), 1-8 (2019). [Article]
[12] Cho JS. A Study on Factors Influencing the Terrorist Damage -Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Ripple Effect-. International Journal of terrorism & National Security, 3(1), 6-10 (2018).  [Article]
[13] Lee DR. Ethnic Conflicts in Xinjiang, China. Critical Review of History, 85, 81-103 (2008).
[14] Clarke M. China's Internal Security Dilemma and the Great Western Development. Asian Studies Review, 31(3), 323-342 (2007).
[15] Joanne SF. Securitization, Insecurity and Conflict in Contemporary Xinjiang. Central Asian Survey, 38(1), 1-26 (2019).
[16] Kong BJ. A Study on the Minority Nationalism and Sinocentrism in China -With Focus on Tibetan Independence and Uighur Independence. The Journal of International Relations, 12(1), 137-160 (2009).
[17] Joshua T. Repression, Opportunity, and Innovation: The Evolution of Terrorism in Xinjiang, China. Terrorism and Political Violence, 30(4), 569-588 (2018).
[18] Kim JG. A Study on the East Turkistan Separatist Independence Movement and China’s Response. Journal of Northeast Studies, 42, 43-67 (2007).
[19] Yu BH. Theoretical Approach to Radicalization and Violent Extremism That Leads to Terrorism. International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 2(2), 12-18 (2017). [Article]
[20] Lee DS & Ahn YK. Review for Enactment of Anti-terrorism Law in China. Convergence Security Journal, 14(6), 51-61 (2014).
[21] Lee DK. A Study on Anti-terrorism Law and Criminal Law Terrorist Crime in China. Journal of Northeast Asian Law Studies, 10(3), 97-129 (2017).
[22] Shin SC. A Study on Terrorist Organizations in the Xinjiang-uighur Autonomous Region of China. Journal of China Studies, 15, 149-184 (2013).
[23] Piao ZG & Min SX. Status of China’s Counter-terrorism Legislation, Issues and Future Challenges. Chinese Law Review, 28, 57-84 (2016).
[24] Kim YK. Reinforcement of Hard-line Policy against Xinjiang Uighur Society during Xi Jinping’s Period. Journal of Chinese Studies, 78, 159-178 (2019).



? Source: goodnews1.com