Paradox of COVID-19 Pandemic, Strengthening Neo-Liberalist's Way of GLOBAL GOVERNANCE Building to Overcome Vaccine ..

Policy
By. Sangsoo Lee Views. 1765

Abstract

Purpose: This paper intends to find alternatives to strengthen global governance in vaccine distribution amid the rise of vaccine nationalism in the international community. To this end, Chapter 2 briefly outlines the risks of vaccine nationalism and the concept of global governance. Chapter 3 examines the status of vaccine development in major countries and Chapter 4 suggests ways to establish global vaccine governance. Chapter 5 summarizes the previous discussions and suggests a policy alternative for securing vaccines for the ROK.

Method: The spread of COVID-19 has led to the fall of neoliberalism, but to end the COVID-19 pandemic, only infectious disease control through strengthening transformative neo-liberal way of strengthening international governance can overcome the vaccine nationalism. Global Governance refers to the performance of various interested parties through horizontal cooperation to achieve a common purpose, especially the public purpose.

Results: The policy alternatives to overcome vaccination nationalism and end the global COVID-19 pandemic are as follows. First, it is possible to effectively respond to various infectious diseases in the future by strengthening the disease management function of the UN and rearranging of WHO for the fair distribution of vaccines. Second, AI technology-based platforms can be used to optimize the use of early warning and mobilize necessary resources for preventive measures. Third, patent rights for vaccine manufacturing technologies should be revoked and vaccines should be produced and administered simultaneously regardless of country or patent to prevent the spread. Fourth, measures to limit national sovereignty at the global governance level should be clearly defined. Fifth, cooperation with WHO and transnational pharmaceutical companies, and NGO, IGO(Intergovernmental Organization) are key to combating vaccination nationalism's politics.

Conclusion: The implications of major countries' vaccine development and vaccine diplomacy for the ROK are as follows. First, the ROK also needs to continue to develop vaccines and treatments, foster human resources in related fields, and establish active international cooperation. Second, it is necessary to strengthen the international system to develop vaccines and treatments. Third, it is necessary to actively secure vaccines through the production of a licensing method that introduces technology, not just consignment production in Korea, or equity investment in overseas vaccine companies, which requires the government's full support for the industry.

[Keywords] COVID-19, Neo-Liberalism, Pandemic, Vaccine Nationalism, Global Governance



References

[1] Lee S. Spread of the Covid-19 and the Fall of Neoliberalism: State's Increased Police Role. Regula-tions, 6(1), 1-9 (2021). [Article]
[2] Nhamo G & David C & Hlengiwe PK & Nthivhiseni M. Covid-19 Vaccines and Treatment Nationalism: Challenges for Low-income Countries and the Attainment of the SDGs. Global Public Health, 16(3), 319-339 (2021).
[3] Guimon J & Rajeesh N. Ending the Covid-19 Pandemic Requires More International Collaboration. Research-Technology Management, 63(5), 38-41 (2021).
[4] Forman L & Jillian CK. Global Health and Human Rights in the Time of Covid-19: Response, Re-strictions, and Legitimacy. Journal of Human Rights, 19(5), 551-552 (2021).
[5] Tkachenko AV & Sergei M & Ahmed E & George NW & Zachary JW. Time-dependent Heterogeneity Leads to Transient Suppression of the Covid-19 Epidemic, not Herd Immunity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(17), 1-12 (2021).
[7] Ruijter AD. How the EU Vaccine Troubles could have Partially been Prevented Ten Years Ago. The Lancet Regional Health-Europe, 3, 1-1 (2021).
[8] Lee S. The Changes That Covid-19 has Brought about. The Korean Journal of Humanities and the Social Sciences, 44(2), 251-255 (2020).
[11] Rinott E & Ihan Y & Lewis YE. Reduction in Covid-19 Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation Following Implementation of a National Covid-19 Vaccination Program-israel, December 2020-February 2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 70(9), 326-328 (2021).
[13] Kim D. Government Roles in Policy Networks against Covid-19: Comparing Two Cases in S. Korea. Protection Convergence, 5(2), 14-26 (2020). [Article]
[14] Ha J. A Study on the Post-corona Security Industry. Regulations, 6(1), 55-62 (2021). [Article]
[15] Park G & Kim H & Yi L. Virtue for Post Covid-19 and AI Technology. Robotics & AI Ethics, 5(2), 8-18 (2020). [Article]
[16] Cho H & Park S & Im Y. Human Security Task and Prospect on Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Terrorism & National Security, 5(2), 48-55 (2020). [Article]
[18] Choi E. Ethical Debates Surrounding the Development of Vaccines During Covid-19 Pandemic. Bio, Ethics, and Policy, 4(2), 6-7 (2020).
[19] Lyou B. The Role and Limitations of the World Health Organization(WHO): Focusing on Covid-19 Outbreak. Hongik Law Review, 21(4), 92-119 (2020).
[21] Bollyky TJ & Bown CP. The Tragedy of Vaccine Nationalism: Only Cooperation Can End the Pan-demic. Foreign Affairs, 99(5), 96-108 (2020).
[22] Fidler DP. Vaccine Nationalism's Politics. Science, 369(6505), 749-749 (2020).



[9] Cox RW. Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. Columbia University (1987).
[10] Pierre J & Peters BG. Governance, Politics and the State. St. Martin's (2000).



[6] https://www.eiu.com/ (2021).
[12] http://www.ibric.org/ (2021).
[17] https://www.medpagetoday.com/ (2021).
[20] Abas MZ. Practical Implications of Vaccine Nationalism: A Short-sighted and Risky Approach in Response to Covid-19. Research Paper (2020).



? Source: medicaltimes.com